Akron

Akron wants to help small business owners grow, but officials say they need more help from banks

PNC and Huntington buildings in Downtown Akron. Photos by Abbey Marshall

PNC and Huntington buildings in Downtown Akron. Photos by Abbey Marshall

Rubber City Match — an entrepreneurial development program that, city officials say, is designed to give historically marginalized business owners a boost to help them get lending from banks — has so far had a big problem: Getting lending from banks.

Rubber City Match offers business coaching to new and expanding small businesses, then helps connect them to vacant retail spaces. It is based on a successful program in Detroit in which participants were mentored and created business plans to pitch to a board of lenders in pursuit of funding, as well as pairing them with vacant retail space.

At the end of the first cohort’s programming, the city is providing $100,000 in grants. Qualifying participants can apply for up to $50,000. In a program of 17 people, up to 12 of whom are eligible to apply for the cash award, that could mean stiff competition for funding. The cohort is 75% Black and 60% female.

The $100,000 was an investment in the program and its mission, but Deputy Mayor for the Office of Integrated Development James Hardy said the department cannot afford much more than that. 

That’s where they were hoping banks would help: After aiding the business owners, the city’s role is theoretically to connect them with lenders. 

“The city will never be able to lend the capital needed to move the needle on this issue,” Hardy says. “It’s really important that we have equitable lending from our finance institutions, because they have more resources to lend than we ever will as a city.”

Akron banks respond to the ask — and some sign on after request for comment

By the end of the program, all the business plans will be vetted and the owners will be  thoroughly trained: the makings of a low-risk investment, the city says, citing as evidence the capital it put toward the program itself.

Still, Hardy says, “I was in the room with local representatives of every bank with a presence in Akron,” including both collaborative and one-on-one meetings with representatives from each of the banks in 2019. “All of them declined to participate.” 

As a result, instead of all participants getting a chance to present to a lending committee made up of banks, only two will receive those $50,000 grants from the city with support from nonprofit lenders. 

That is, until The Devil Strip reached out for comment in September. Three of the five banks contacted — Huntington, PNC and Fifth Third — then scheduled meetings with the city to discuss how to participate in the program.

  • Huntington reached out to the city to support the program after The Devil Strip requested comment, with spokesperson Emily Smith saying: “We always appreciate the opportunity to learn from our communities and do our part to support them. We’ll continue the conversation directly with the city to learn more about how we can help.” 

  • PNC said they were approached in September 2019 for support, but could not consider it because the 2019 budget was already appropriated. PNC needed time to consider the request and did not reconnect to confirm or deny support due to the pandemic, says PNC regional president for Akron Joe Luckring, but they plan to meet with city officials in early October to discuss participation.

  • Fifth Third Bank said the representative in those meetings retired earlier this year. After request for comment, bank representatives said they will reach out to the city to establish a new point of contact and review the program.

  • The city met with the U.S. Bank district manager and team members on two occasions in 2019. The city said U.S. Bank declined to participate. U.S. Bank declined to comment on the program, stating, “U.S. Bank is not in a position to comment about a program that we are not currently involved in, but we remain committed to supporting the Akron community and are always open to opportunities to invest in our shared future,” citing other financial commitments to other local nonprofits such as the East Akron Neighborhood Development Corporation.

  • A city official said they met with a KeyBank representative in 2019 who declined to participate. KeyBank declined to comment about the program, but told The Devil Strip they have provided more than $110 million in small business loans to businesses in “low-to-moderate income urban and rural communities” in Northeast Ohio. “We invite anyone interested in learning more about grant funding through the KeyBank Foundation, and the formal process through which organizations can apply, to contact us,” says KeyBank spokesperson Matthew Pitts. Hardy did note that KeyBank was instrumental in a new small business revolving loan being launched at Western Reserve Community Fund next month that otherwise would not be able to get off the ground.

Hardy thinks the banks’ reactions reflect a systemic problem, however. 

“There is a huge problem in Akron of POC- and women-owned businesses trying to secure traditional lending at the same success rate as their white male counterparts,” Hardy says. “It seems like with the banks, there’s no recognition of the structural racism that has played a huge role in Akron and places like Akron that dictated your credit score or being able to lean into friends and family for equity — all the things we as the majority take for granted.”

What can Akron learn from Detroit? Work with nontraditional lenders, that city’s leaders say

Motor City Match, the model on which Akron based its program, has been wildly successful, fronting $2 million in grants for about 40 businesses a year and connecting award recipients to retail space and lenders.

Launched in 2015, the program sought to solve two problems common in the Rust Belt: too much vacant retail space in the city and a lack of capital access for small business owners. In addition to cash grants, businesses can apply for assistance with business planning, space and design.

“The premise of our program is that there are very talented entrepreneurs in Detroit that lack access to capital,” says Drew Lucco, small business development manager at the Detroit Economic Growth Corporation, which runs Motor City Match.

“We know that one of the reasons is because it is generally harder for minority entrepreneurs to get loans,” he says. (Detroit’s population is 79% Black; Akron’s population is 30% Black.) “It’s generally harder for any first-time entrepreneurs to get a loan from traditional banks, really. We came into the program with that as one of the premises. The idea was, if we can offer some capital, that would allow people to complete projects without a loan or make it easier to get loans.”

Lucco said he did not find it surprising that Akron had difficulties with securing banks’ participation. They haven’t had much luck with traditional lenders either. 

“Very few of our projects get funding from traditional banks,” Lucco says, though he did note that they’ve worked with a few over the years for other programming. “We are very blessed in Detroit to have a community of nontraditional lenders… They think of themselves as character-based lenders rather than credit-based lenders. Their goal is to lend to projects that contribute to community development.”

Akron has been successful in onboarding nontraditional lenders with similar visions. 

“We’re a nonprofit for a reason,” says Chris Faircloth, the lending manager of Economic & Community Development Institute (ECDI) Akron, a nonprofit that provides training, technical assistance and loan capital to entrepreneurs who do not qualify for traditional bank loans. 

“We spend more time with clients than would be financially feasible on a lending process to turn a profit on it with interest,” he says. “[With banks,] there’s just no time to really sit down and evaluate if your credit is low, are you irresponsible with credit or did you have a bad life circumstance? It’s a numbers game. To lend to small businesses at a profitable level, you can’t really spend an inordinate amount of time doing those things.”

A majority of ECDI’s clients are referred by larger regional banks, such as the ones mentioned in this story that partner with nonprofit lenders. The ECDI then makes a closer, character-based determination.

Lucco emphasizes the importance of that approach when it comes to small business funding in Motor City Match, particularly for minority business owners. First-time business owners have less credit and less experience, and it’s difficult for startups to get loans without a significant amount of collateral.

“It’s a Catch-22,” Faircloth says. “You can’t get a loan because you don’t have cash, and you need a loan because you don’t have cash.”

Detroit’s Motor City Match supports about 10 businesses per quarter, doling out $500,000 in grants ranging between $5,000 to $100,000 to each of its winners. In some cases, the grant will not cover all the costs associated with a startup, especially because the retail space had been vacant for years and might need significant rehab. That’s when the lenders come in at the end of the program to provide a loan. Lenders view the $50,000 grant as equity, so it changes the underwriting, allowing entrepreneurs to secure a loan more easily.

What does this mean for the Rubber City Match program?

But Akron’s story is different from Detroit’s. The city cannot yet afford to front $2 million each year. 

In a program where 75% of the businesses of the first cohort are Black-owned and 60% are female-owned, Hardy says the lack of participation from banks leads to questions about systematic oppression that has kept certain groups out of economic development.

“I have heard the term ‘unbankable’ more times in those meetings than I’ve ever heard in the last five years,” Hardy says. “It makes you wonder that really means. No one could seem to give me a definition.”

All of the major banks in Akron The Devil Strip contacted for comment — Huntington, PNC, KeyBank, U.S. Bank and Fifth Third — received the highest rating awarded by the Community Reinvestment Act, which monitors how well banking institutions meet the credit needs of the areas they serve.

That doesn’t eliminate Hardy’s questions, however. “Through my conversations with constituents, it’s just not happening. There’s just a fundamental disconnect between what banks are saying happens and what people are saying happens.”

While some banks are not participating as traditional lenders, many in the list above, including PNC, Fifth-Third and U.S. Bank, have provided funding and grants for nontraditional lenders participating in the program, including the ECDI and Western Reserve Community Fund.

Hardy says there’s an open invitation from the city to the banks to participate in the Rubber City Match program or any future initiative to include entrepreneurs of color.

“We’re not giving up,” Hardy says. “The invitation [to the banks] is always there. We think we’re going to have very bankable businesses in our program, but there are very bankable businesses right now that are not successful in the traditional lending market.”

Originally appeared in The Devil Strip via Report for America on Oct. 12, 2020.

Is Akron’s tax abatement program working? Here’s who is using it and why

Ryan homes development. Photo by Abbey Marshall

Ryan homes development. Photo by Abbey Marshall

Akron is passing on the opportunity to collect millions of dollars in property taxes in hopes of spurring housing development. 

Akron in 2017 launched a 100% residential property tax abatement. The owner of any qualifying newly constructed home or home renovation does not have to pay property taxes for 15 years after construction, which can amount to tens of thousands of dollars in savings. 

Officials say it’s starting to work: Hundreds of property owners have applied for the tax abatement, and hundreds more likely will when homes currently under construction are finished. 

The city boasts that, since the program launched, more than 400 new housing units have been built within city limits or will be completed by fall, up from just 14 units in 2015. At least 60 additional homeowners have applied for tax abatements after making renovations to their homes. Total construction costs tallied in the 153 abatement requests — both new and additions/renovations — have mounted to $52.8 million so far. 

And there are hundreds of additional homes under construction that will, presumably, apply for tax abatements after construction is complete. 

While the city is focused on reeling people back from the suburbs, the program comes with trade-offs — primarily, giving up the ability to collect nearly $2 million in new property tax revenue per year. 

And the program’s benefits have largely been concentrated in neighborhoods where housing markets are already stable.

“We had this exact conversation with City Council, and my response was, 100% times zero is still zero,” says Jason Segedy, the city’s director of Planning and Urban Development. “If there is no house, we’re not losing any tax dollars. It’s not as simple as saying, ‘the city is losing these property taxes,’ because these projects by and large weren’t being built. We were getting zero tax dollars from houses that don’t exist.”

This story is part of “Home in Akron,” a project by the Akron Media Collaborative based on community feedback from a series of 2019 town hall meetings across Akron. Throughout 2020, we’ll be exploring the complex issues confronting Akron’s housing and rental markets and the impact on citizens and the city’s goal of growing its population. The collaborative includes journalists from the Akron Beacon Journal, The Devil Strip, WKSU, Your Voice Ohio, News Channel 5 and Reveal – The Center for Investigative Reporting. 

Is the tax abatement program working?

The goal of the tax abatement program, officials say, is simple: To help spur population growth by offering alternatives to Akron’s suburbs. 

Akron’s population peaked at nearly 300,000 people in the early 1960s and has been shrinking since, falling below 200,000 presently. City officials, setting an ambitious goal of growing the population to 250,000 by 2050, are now asking: how does Akron bring back people from the suburbs and foster economic development within city limits?

The city cites the sheer number of new homes under construction as a positive indicator. 

Development in Akron plateaued after the population boom, with 64% of homes in the city built before 1960 and more housing built during the Great Depression than since 2000. In 2015, just 14 new houses were built in Akron. 

That number has skyrocketed since, with more than 400 housing units completed and an additional 1,200 in the planning, design and construction phases, the city says. 

“[The property tax abatement program] is kind of set up as a way to lure people of means back in from the suburbs so the city can capture their income tax,” says Kyle Julien, the recently departed director of urban planning at the East Akron Neighborhood Development Corporation, a nonprofit developer. “That’s important. We currently have a lot of people driving into the city from the suburbs, and we don’t want that trend to continue.”

Who is using property tax abatements?

The tax abatement program, Segedy says, is designed for just what Julien describes: winning middle- and upper-income households back from the suburbs. 

Early adopters of the program are primarily developing single-family homes that are much more expensive than the majority of homes within city limits. 

About 58% of 153 applications filed between the launch of the program and Aug. 24 involved single-family housing units, with a median value of $271,500 built by both for-profit and nonprofit developers. That is high-end in almost all of Akron: At present, the median price for a home listed for sale in Akron is $116,000, according to data from real estate brokerage Redfin.

tax-abatement-3.png

Segedy notes that in comparison to the suburbs, a house priced in the mid-$200,000s isn’t all that expensive. According to Redfin, the median price for a home listed for sale in Cuyahoga Falls is $154,000; in Green, $243,000; and in Stow, $207,000.

About 8% of the tax abatement applications, or 13 out of 153, came from nonprofit community developers like Habitat for Humanity and the East Akron Neighborhood Development Corporation.

Those who want to upgrade older and existing homes are eligible for tax write-offs if they complete a renovation that totals $5,000 or more, such as new roofing, windows, garages and more. Renovations accounted for 60 applications, totaling about  $17.5 million — $9.8 million of which accounts for 17 housing units at the East End, the old Goodyear Heights campus being converted to a 1.4 million square foot, mixed-use property for offices, medical and retail uses, hotel rooms, restaurants and apartments.

More than half of renovation applications have come from just four neighborhoods: Northwest Akron, Fairlawn Heights and Merriman Hills, where home values are already among the highest in the city; and Cascade Valley, home to the Northside development, where owners received tax abatements to build out seven units. 

Segedy himself applied for a tax abatement after he added a sunroom to his home. He called his participation a good test of the program, which requires a two-page application and a $50 fee. The city processes applications and passes them along to the Summit County Fiscal Office for approval.

“In the case of an addition, the tax value went up slightly, so it knocked a little off of what our taxes would’ve been,” Segedy says. “It won’t make a giant difference in your property tax bill, but it’s still a nice incentive.”

The city hopes that the tax abatement will encourage people to put money into their houses with the hopes of getting it back once the market is stronger.

“We need to start where we can start,” Segedy says. “The alternative is that there are no new houses built anywhere in Akron. That doesn’t help anyone.”

tax abatement map.png

What are the trade-offs?

Though the city is hoping to boost population growth and housing development, Akron stands to lose out on approximately $30 million in new property tax revenue over 15 years — and that’s without any additional applications. 

“There’s a trade-off here that needs to be thought through,” Julien says. “The city is primarily funded through income taxes, but we have a lot of entities funded through property taxes getting a short side of this deal.”

Those entities include Akron Public Schools, which are the primary recipient of property taxes at about 66% of the bill. The city only receives about 13% of Akron residents’ property taxes, with the rest going to the Akron Zoo, metro parks, city libraries, Summit County Developmental Disabilities Board and others, according to a sample property tax bill provided by the city.

Akron Public Schools relies on local property taxes for about 35% of its funding. If Akron’s population were to grow and more students were to enroll at APS schools, the district says it could handle them, even without additional property tax revenue.

“Largely, our property tax base has not grown since the 2008 recession because of the depressed home values, so stimulating that growth will give us more revenue once we’re able to collect,” says Ryan Pendleton, the Chief Financial Officer and treasurer of APS. He also notes that, while enrollment has been stable for about five years, schools are operating with buildings at about 85% capacity to accommodate changes in enrollment.

The tax abatement is viewed as a down payment for a larger return on investment, he says. Though the city won’t be netting new property taxes for 15 years, theoretically, many more people will live within the district once the abatements expire, and schools will get a boost in funding that didn’t exist before.

In the meantime, Pendleton says the district receives about $4,800 from the state per student enrolled. State funding currently accounts for about 65% of APS funding. 

The city is primarily funded by income taxes, so it hopes to see a spike in the tax dollars it collects if higher-income families buy homes within city limits.

Tax-abatement-2-scaled.jpg

Tax abatement has few benefits for renters, though it has helped non-profit developers

But what about the people who already live in Akron? 

According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, between 2000 and 2018, median rent in Akron jumped 48% while incomes rose just 29%. Adjusting for inflation, renters have lost $4,074 in purchasing power as rent has kept pace with the annual cost of living.

People who own their homes have done much better, financially, than renters. The median income of owner-occupied homes is up 41%, from $41,679 in 2000 to $58,586 in 2018. And since 2010, monthly housing costs have risen 15% for renters while falling 16% for owner-occupants.

The proportion of Akronites who are renting is rising, too. In 2000, 40.6% of the roughly 90,000 housing units in Akron were rentals compared to 49.4% of the 85,000 units that remained in 2018.

The tax abatement program was never designed to fully address those issues, Segedy says. 

According to a review of tax abatement applications, new home and apartment construction in neighborhoods where housing markets aren’t already stable are almost exclusively tied to Habitat for Humanity, the Urban Neighborhood Development Corporation and the East Akron Neighborhood Development Corporation. These nonprofit development companies are latching onto the program to provide homeownership options to those who may otherwise be unable to secure mortgages. 

Habitat for Humanity, which acts as both financier of its projects and mortgage servicing company to qualifying buyers, has used the tax abatement program 11 times so far with eight others under construction expected to apply, according to Rochelle Sibbio, president of Habitat for Humanity of Summit County.

“I just think that it’s a wonderful opportunity for low-income families,” Sibbio says. “When you look at what payments are on a monthly mortgage (in Akron) versus homes we’re building in other parts of the county, the payments are generally $200 less a month in Akron” because of the property tax abatement.

Segedy argues that the tax abatement program may still aid renters. Apartment developers can apply for tax abatement and could theoretically “implement lower rent costs from the property tax savings,” he says.

“The program isn’t really intended for low-income groups, but it does help with rental projects for sure,” adds Julien, citing a recent application for Middlebury Commons, a 40-unit apartment building for low-income seniors.

“That’s a big deal,” he says. “It’s very expensive to develop new buildings. Our margins as developers for affordable rental housing are pretty slim, so to get that 15-year break is incredibly helpful.”

Though the majority of tax abatement applicants have been located in neighborhoods with higher median income levels, Segedy remains optimistic that those numbers will change as additional projects are built. For instance, he cites the LeBron James Family Foundation’s I PROMISE apartment building on Cedar Street, which is expected to apply after it is built.

Segedy believes that bringing wealthier people back to the city will have trickle-down effects, too. He argues that retail businesses have left Akron over the last few decades, taking jobs with them. If Akron’s population grows — especially its population of comparatively wealthy homeowners — he believes it could bring those job opportunities back to the city.

“I think getting new housing in Akron is very important, whether or not low-income people are the people living in it,” Segedy says.

What does the future of the program look like?

Segedy says the indicator of success of the program is that the city “gets rid of it.”

“I can’t wait for the day we get rid of it,” Segedy says. “Cities don’t want to lose out on tax dollars. Our position has been: we need this as an incentive for now.”

The tax abatement, still in its infancy, has lots of room to be altered based on results. For example, Segedy says, if the real estate market takes off in certain neighborhoods, the city could remove those areas from the program to attempt to spur growth in other parts of Akron. They could also change the number of years homes are exempt from property taxes.

He also notes that the program is not intended to fix every housing issue Akron faces — for instance, the problem of old homes that are expensive to renovate. He calls urban revitalization a “long game.” 

“We will know the strategy is working if our population begins growing again in the 2020s, if we see a modest uptick in our artificially low housing prices and property values — $60,000 houses now becoming $80,000 houses, et cetera — which will mean more wealth and equity for existing homeowners in Akron,” Segedy says.